Now, talking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that's normally employed for even ten per cent of its possible.
What's it to possess the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", when the person has fastened his wrist to the maximum after a dip and a couple of strokes, then return instantly to couch under the umbrella?
If that is their principal use, it's merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of the modern era that dates back to the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the category can boast, was tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of their well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famed documentary -movie additionally winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist turned into a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other with no crown shield shoulders, imitated a bit by everybody.
These are only a couple of the first cases that show how - fiction or fact - for more than fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it's also from this day the manufacturers in regards to describing their versions started to use the term: "appropriate for any occasion".
The 007 change, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanisms of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose function was played by the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their real use within this massive family whose roots would simply deal with "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to dread even when you have to wash the hands.
However, a true diver's watch has generally always had a lot to say technically speaking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive philosophies of those references.
I've a long standing friend who's a professional diver and who, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at large depths.
A True wrist sub must be able to guarantee the following performances:
Excellent visibility during the dive
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate verification of the performance of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its motion, either quartz or mechanical
However, the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches need to adhere to certain rules like those described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, what we all know is the greatest, the best sub could be ultimately a watchable to provide attributes considerably milder and easier to handle.
I recall this in order to only immerse the surface in maximum safety, a timepiece should be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that is not so when it is done a banal swim in the sea. It would be better to avoid diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely to a screw-on crown better still if protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
And the safety on the watertight status of this submerged timepieces?
Just for people who'd never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in case the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a clear condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why an abyssal super dive watch might have to be rushed to a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on very few versions, which honestly I don't understand why.
You might have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, read more have forgotten to screw the crown tightly. It's by far the most common case.
Suggestion - As soon as you have worn the costume decide on the fly leave your diver someplace safe read more or obligatorily create a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a little 'of issues related to the time that must satisfy with the water, and also given the essential advice, I show you which - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I have divided them into two categories. The sequence in which they appear doesn't signify any ranking.